LANCASTER HIGH SCHOOL

 

School Accountability Report Card  

School Year 2002-2003

 

School Information

District Information

 School Name

 Lancaster High

 District Name

 Antelope Valley Union High

 Principal

  Mr. William Appleton

 Superintendent

  Dr. David Vierra

 Street

 44701 32nd St. West

 Street

 44811 North Sierra Hwy.

 City, State, Zip

 Lancaster, CA    93536

 City, State, Zip

 Lancaster, CA    93534-3226

 Phone Number

  (661) 726-7649

 Phone Number

 (661) 948-7655

 FAX Number

  (661) 726-7694

 FAX Number

 (661) 948-5446

 Web Site

  www.lnhs.org

 Web Site

  www.avdistrict.org

 Email Address

  plamb@avhsd.org

 

 

 CDS Code

 19-64246-1995844

 

 


School Description and Mission Statement

Principal’s Message from William Appleton

It is with great pride that I represent the staff and students of Lancaster High School.  I am pleased to offer this School Accountability Report Card, which is designed to give a snapshot of the school and its programs.  Although this document is not able to provide significant details into any of the required areas, it should give an indication of our efforts to offer quality educational programs. 

The staff works diligently to provide opportunities for all students to gain academic growth, be life-long learners, and develop the skills of effective thinkers and communicators.  A number of special programs provide extended opportunities for additional success during and after high school.

A sense of community is continually sought that extends beyond the classroom.  Parents and local businesses are encouraged to be an active part in our programs.  In the spirit of unity and mutual support, your participation is desired in the hope of offering students the most relevant and valuable experiences for continued success.  All comments and questions are encouraged.

Lancaster High School Mission Statement

The mission of Lancaster High School is to empower students to succeed with the choices and challenges of the twenty-first century.  The staff at Lancaster High School works to assure all students the opportunity to demonstrate growth in academic achievement, emotional maturity, physical well-being, and social responsibility.  The faculty will use the best instructional strategies and curriculum to assist in providing students with a quality education.



Opportunities for Parental Involvement

 Contact Person Name

  Carol Lowe

 Contact Person Phone Number

  726-7649 x782

 Lancaster High School welcomes parent/guardian involvement.  We rely on Parent Volunteers for a number of projects and committees at the High School.  A Parent Advisory Committee meets once a month with the principal to discuss school-wide issues such as curriculum standards, programs, and policy decisions that would benefit from community input.  Similar advisory committees exist for our career academies, the English Language Learner program, and the II/USP grant committee.

To get information on the Parent Volunteer Program, or if you have any questions regarding school committee, please contact Carol  Lowe, Parent Volunteer Coordinator,  at 726-7649 x782 or a school administrator.


I. Demographic Information

Student Enrollment, by Grade Level

 Grade Level

 Enrollment

 Grade 9

869 

 Grade 10

773 

 Grade 11

675 

 Grade 12

558 

 Total

2875 


Student Enrollment, by Ethnic Group
The percentage of students is the number of students in a racial/ethnic category divided by the school's most recent California Basic Educational Data System (CBEDS) total enrollment.

 Racial/Ethnic Category

 Number
of
Students

 Percentage
of
Students

 Racial/Ethnic Category

 Number
of
Students

 Percentage
of
Students

 African-American

537 

18.7 

 Hispanic or Latino

691 

24.0 

 American Indian or Alaska Native

26 

0.9 

 Pacific Islander

0.2 

 Asian-American

77 

2.7 

 White (Not Hispanic)

1,474 

51.3 

 Filipino-American

65 

2.3 

 Other

0.0 


II. School Safety and Climate for Learning

School Safety Plan

 Date of Last Review/Update

  March, 2002

 Date Last Discussed with Staff

  September, 2002

School safety continues to remain a top priority.  Issues that revolve around safety include, but are not limited to, school climate, violence on campus, crisis preparedness, school law enforcement relations and alcohol/drug use.  Lancaster High School’s Safety Action Plan is updated and reviewed yearly.  In our ongoing review, attention is given to the Climate Survey conducted in 2001 that asked students about teasing, crime, prejudice, conflict resolution, and approaches that would improve the school climate.  Another survey was conducted in January of 2002 that raised school safety as an issue by those polled.  Please refer to the section immediately following for information on many programs that Lancaster High School has instituted to enhance school climate, improve school safety, and promote a positive learning environment.


School Programs and Practices that Promote a Positive Learning Environment

In January of 2002, a random survey was presented to parents, students, and staff.  In that survey, school safety was an issue raised by those polled.  From those survey results, the LINK crew program was initiated and II/USP money was used to train upperclassmen, who in turn trained 80% of incoming freshmen to help transition them to high school and talk about school climate, including sexual harassment, racial issues, and gang tensions.  Counselors were assigned to LINK leaders who act as conduits between counselors and freshmen who may need specific help transitioning to high school.

 

The Comprehensive Guidance Program (CGP) at Lancaster High School is the focal point of the guidance department.  Six credentialed counselors with the help of support staff provide proactive classroom lessons to every grade level.  The focus of the lessons is personal/social, academic, and career domains.  Each of these areas of student development encompasses a variety of desired student learning competencies.  Every lesson plan meets Lancaster High School’s ESLR’s, as well as the National Standards for School counseling programs.  Pre and post-tests, surveys and questionnaires are used to evaluate the CGP, along with surveys conducted amongst 9th and 10th grade students.

 

Peer Helping and Peer Mediation has been expanded to include peer time in Healthful Living classrooms with a focus on 9th grade, which is the largest at-risk population on campus.

 

It is also felt by many members of the staff that the new Air Force JROTC program is helping to foster order in the lives of many of the students.  In fact, some of the strongest support for this program has come from parents of at-risk students enrolled in the course.

 

Lancaster High School has also partnered with the Josephson Institute of Ethics to employ their “Character Counts!” program in its athletics program.  Character Counts! promotes strong character and ethics in students, parents, coaches, teachers, and administrators through training in six principles of strong character:  trustworthiness, respect, responsibility, fairness, caring, and good citizenship.  These individuals then go on to model and encourage that behavior for their peers in the school and community at large.  The program incorporates a reward program for strong behavior that includes patches for letterman jackets.  Parents, students, and coaches are then surveyed at the end of each school year to gauge the effectiveness of the program and determine if any modifications are necessary. 

 

On January 14, 2003, Lancaster High School hosted the AV Youth Summit, a one-day workshop to identify, brainstorm, and develop innovative ways to educate, adopt, advocate, and role model appropriate tolerance and character behaviors on the school. Attendees at the Summit encompassed two hundred 8th through 12th grade students, school administration, and community based leaders.

Students were selected from various school, ethnic and leadership clubs from Lancaster High School. Workshops were designed to develop skills in leadership, character, tolerance, conflict resolution, school spirit, and human relations.  There were also workshops on the juvenile justice system, community, rules & policies, and action plan processes. The Summit was a coordinated collaborative of the Antelope Valley Human Relations Task Force, Antelope Valley Mentoring Partnership, Antelope Valley Union High School District, Los Angeles Commission on Human Relations, and Murrell’s Service Center.  The expected benefits and outcome of the AV Youth Summit will be further reviewed by the students, the schools, and the community based organizations to ensure that a safe and conducive environment for learning exists on every school campus throughout the district.


Suspensions and Expulsions
The number of suspensions and expulsions is the total number of incidents that result in a suspension or expulsion. The rate of suspensions and expulsions is the total number of incidents divided by the school's California Basic Educational Data System (CBEDS) total enrollment for the given year. In unified school districts, a comparison between a particular type of school (elementary, middle, high) and the district average may be misleading. Schools have the option of comparing their data with the district-wide average for the same type of school.

 

 School

 District

 2000

 2001

 2002

 2000

 2001

 2002

 Suspensions (number)

357 

592 

267 

5518 

4674 

4006 

 Suspensions (rate)

13.7 

22 

9.3 

31.6 

24.9 

20.6 

 Expulsions (number)

27 

32 

18 

263 

334 

262 

 Expulsions (rate)

1.0 

1.2 

0.6 

1.5 

1.8 

1.3 


School Facilities

At Eight years old, Lancaster High School is still the newest school in the district.  Our maintenance, custodial, and grounds crews work year-round to insure that the campus remains in top condition.  This year we added eleven more classrooms to accommodate growth.  When we add portable classrooms we increase student capacity but what must be remembered is that the support structures (gyms, locker rooms, theatre, cafeteria, p.e. facilities and fields) were designed to support a student population of 2100.  We have grown over the last two years and are at 2739 students on Jan 31, 2003.  Just as growth in the Antelope Valley impacts all schools, the building of new schools will alleviate some of the overcrowding in district schools.    


III. Academic Data

Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR)
Through the California Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, students in grades 2-11 are tested annually in various subject areas. Currently, the STAR program includes California Standards Tests (CST) in English Language Arts and Mathematics in grades 2-11, and Science and History-Social Science in grades 9-11; and the Stanford Achievement Test, Ninth Edition (Stanford 9), which tests Reading, Language, Mathematics (grades 2-11), Spelling (grades 2-8), and Science and History-Social Science (grades 9-11 only). Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.

California Standards Tests (CST)
The California Standards Tests show how well students are doing in relation to the state content standards. Student scores are reported as performance levels. The five performance levels are Advanced (exceeds state standards), Proficient (meets standards), Basic (approaching standards), Below Basic (below standards), and Far Below Basic (well below standards). Students scoring at the Proficient or Advanced level have met state standards in that content area. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.
 

CST - English Language Arts
Percentage of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard)

 Grade
Level

 School

 District

 State

 2000

 2001

 2002

 2000

 2001

 2002

 2000

 2001

 2002

 9

 --- 

  26

  31

 --- 

  24

  28

 --- 

 28

 33

 10

 --- 

  29

  34

 --- 

  26

  28

 --- 

 31

 33

 11

 --- 

  25

  28

 --- 

  22

  23

 --- 

 29

 31


CST - Mathematics
Percentage of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard)

 Grade
Level

 School

 District

 State

 2000

 2001

 2002

 2000

 2001

 2002

 2000

 2001

 2002

 9

 --- 

 --- 

 6

 --- 

 --- 

 14

 --- 

 --- 

 22

 10

 --- 

 --- 

 9

 --- 

 --- 

 11

 --- 

 --- 

 21

 11

 --- 

 --- 

 7

 --- 

 --- 

 10

 --- 

 --- 

 18


CST - Science
Percentage of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard)

 Grade
Level

 School

 District

 State

 2000

 2001

 2002

 2000

 2001

 2002

 2000

 2001

 2002

 9

 --- 

 --- 

 51

 --- 

 --- 

 65

 --- 

 --- 

 33

 10

 --- 

 --- 

 24

 --- 

 --- 

 32

 --- 

 --- 

 31

 11

 --- 

 --- 

 13

 --- 

 --- 

 23

 --- 

 --- 

 28


CST - History/Social Science
Percentage of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard)

 Grade
Level

 School

 District

 State

 2000

 2001

 2002

 2000

 2001

 2002

 2000

 2001

 2002

 9

 --- 

 --- 

 17

 --- 

 --- 

 17

 --- 

 --- 

 24

 10

 --- 

 --- 

 21

 --- 

 --- 

 20

 --- 

 --- 

 24

 11

 --- 

 --- 

 23

 --- 

 --- 

 23

 --- 

 --- 

 32


CST - Subgroups - English Language Arts
Percentage of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard)

Grade
Level

 Male 

Female

English
Learners

Not-English
Learners

Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

Not
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

Migrant
Education
Services

 9

 28

 35

 6

 33

 17

  37

 

 10

 29

 39

 3

 35

 17

  39

 

 11

 29

 27

 0

 29

 20

  30

 

 

CST - Subgroups - Mathematics
Percentage of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard)

Grade
Level

 Male 

Female

English
Learners

Not-English
Learners

Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

Not
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

Migrant
Education
Services

 9

 6

 5

 3

  6

  3

  7

 

 10

 13

 5

 14

  9

  10

  9

 

 11

 9

 6

 11

  7

  8

  7

 


CST - Subgroups - Science
Percentage of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard)

Grade
Level

 Male 

Female

English
Learners

Not-English
Learners

Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

Not
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

Migrant
Education
Services

 9

  56

  47

  50

  51

  48

  52

 

 10

  27

  21

  0

  25

  18

  26

 

 11

  18

  8

  9

  13

  16

  12

 


CST - Subgroups - History/Social Science
Percentage of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard)

Grade
Level

 Male 

Female

English
Learners

Not-English
Learners

Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

Not
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

Migrant
Education
Services

 9

  57

  48

  67

  51

  50

  52

 

 10

  27

  22

  6

  25

  16

  25

 

 11

  18

  8

  0

  13

  17

  12

 


CST - Racial/Ethnic Groups - English Language Arts
Percentage of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard)

 Grade
Level

 African-
American

 American
Indian or
Alaska
Native

 Asian-
American

 Filipino-
American

 Hispanic
or Latino

 Pacific
Islander

 White
(not
Hispanic)

 Other

 9

  16

  0

  27

  53

  26

 

  40

 

 10

  18

  33

  57

  26

  27

 

  44

 

 11

  15

  14

  39

  47

  16

 

  35

 

CST - Racial/Ethnic Groups - Mathematics
Percentage of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard)

 Grade
Level

 African-
American

 American
Indian or
Alaska
Native

 Asian-
American

 Filipino-
American

 Hispanic
or Latino

 Pacific
Islander

 White
(not
Hispanic)

 Other

 9

  1

  0

  20

  16

  4

 

  8

 

 10

  6

  0

  21

  0

  5

 

  12

 

 11

  0

  0

  9